OTORITAS LAKI-LAKI DALAM AKAD NIKAH: MENGUJI KONSTRUKSI WALI NASAB DALAM PERSPEKTIF AL-QUR’AN, HADIS, DAN FIKIH MAZHAB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58293/asa.v8i2.227Abstract
Guardianship (wilayah) in marriage contracts is an important issue in Islamic family law, particularly concerning the position of the nasab guardian, whose authority is generally assigned to male relatives. This construction raises questions concerning the normative basis and legal rationale underlying the attribution of guardianship authority to men, particularly since the Qur’an does not explicitly specify the structure and order of nasab guardianship as formulated in Islamic jurisprudential literature. This study aims to analyze the normative basis of male guardianship in marriage contracts and examine the construction and rationale of nasab guardianship from the perspectives of the major schools of Islamic jurisprudence. This research employs a library research method using normative-conceptual and comparative approaches. Primary sources include the Qur’an, hadiths concerning marital guardianship, and classical jurisprudential works of the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Hanbali schools. The data are analyzed descriptively and analytically by comparing the arguments and constructions of guardianship developed by each school. The study seeks to demonstrate that the construction of nasab guardianship concerns not only the gender of the guardian but also the concepts of wilayah, kinship, protection of women's interests, and the structure of family responsibility in Islamic law. Differences among the schools indicate considerable diversity in understanding the scope and form of a guardian's authority in marriage contracts. Therefore, the issue of male guardianship should be understood through a dialogue between normative texts and juristic constructions, allowing the concept of marital guardianship to be examined more comprehensively within the development of contemporary Islamic family law.
Downloads
References
Abu Dawud, Sulayman ibn al-Asy‘ath. 2009. Sunan Abi Dawud. Riyadh: Dar al-Salam.
Al-Kasani, ‘Ala’ al-Din Abu Bakr ibn Mas‘ud. 1986. Bada’i‘ al-Sana’i‘ fi Tartib al-Syara’i‘. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Nawawi, Yahya ibn Syaraf. 1991. Al-Majmu‘ Syarh al-Muhadhdhab. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Sarakhsi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad. 1993. Al-Mabsut. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Syatibi, Ibrahim ibn Musa. 1997. Al-Muwafaqat. Beirut: Dar Ibn ‘Affan.
Al-Tirmidhi, Muhammad ibn ‘Isa. 1998. Sunan al-Tirmidhi. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.
Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. 1989. Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Qudamah, ‘Abd Allah ibn Ahmad. 1997. Al-Mughni. Riyadh: Dar ‘Alam al-Kutub.
Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad. 2004. Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa Nihayat al-Muqtasid. Kairo: Dar al-Hadith.
Ibrahim, Johnny. 2006. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zed, Mestika. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miftahul Qodril R, Anisah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

